Roundup
Best Open Source SIEM
Ranked comparison of open-source SIEM platforms and free alternatives — covering Wazuh, Elastic, OpenSearch, and when to consider AI-native commercial alternatives.
Top 10 open-source SIEM options ranked
Evaluated on detection capability, deployment complexity, community strength, scalability, and true total cost of ownership. Updated 2025.
ManySignal (Free Trial)
AI-native SOC platform with free trial — more capable than open-source SIEM at similar entry cost
Strengths
- AI investigation and autonomous triage included
- No engineering overhead to operationalise
- Scales without infrastructure management
Watch-outs
- — Not open-source — SaaS subscription after trial
Best for
Teams evaluating open-source SIEM who want to compare against AI-native alternative
Wazuh
Open-source SIEM and XDR with endpoint agents and compliance features
Strengths
- Free and open-source
- Wazuh agent for endpoint log collection
- Good compliance pack for PCI DSS, HIPAA, CIS
Watch-outs
- — Requires engineering effort to deploy and maintain
- — Detection rules require tuning
- — No AI investigation or autonomous triage
Best for
Budget-constrained teams with engineering resources to self-host a SIEM
Elastic Security (Free Tier)
ELK Stack with Elastic Security free tier for detection and alerting
Strengths
- Powerful Elasticsearch search capabilities
- Free tier with basic security features
- Large community and detection rule library
Watch-outs
- — Free tier limited — advanced features require paid license
- — High operational complexity at scale
Best for
Engineering teams already running Elasticsearch infrastructure
OpenSearch Security Analytics
AWS open-source fork of Elasticsearch with security detection plugin
Strengths
- Free and open-source
- Security analytics plugin with Sigma rule support
- AWS managed deployment option
Watch-outs
- — Less mature security ecosystem than Elastic
- — Requires engineering effort to set up
Best for
AWS-native teams wanting an open-source alternative to Elastic
Security Onion
Open-source network security monitoring and log management distribution
Strengths
- All-in-one distribution with Elastic, Zeek, Suricata
- Strong network detection capabilities
- Good community documentation
Watch-outs
- — Primarily network-focused — less identity and cloud coverage
- — Requires dedicated hardware or VM infrastructure
Best for
Security teams wanting free network security monitoring and log management
Graylog (Open Source)
Log management platform with free open-source tier
Strengths
- User-friendly UI compared to raw ELK
- Streams and pipelines for log routing
- Alerting on log patterns
Watch-outs
- — Security detection less capable than SIEM-specific tools
- — Enterprise features require paid license
Best for
Teams wanting accessible open-source log management with basic alerting
OSSIM (AT&T Cybersecurity)
Open-source SIEM with asset discovery and vulnerability management
Strengths
- Free and open-source
- Asset discovery built in
- OTRS ticketing integration
Watch-outs
- — Legacy architecture — limited cloud and SaaS support
- — Active development slowed significantly
Best for
On-premises-heavy environments with legacy infrastructure wanting free SIEM coverage
Apache Metron (retired)
Big-data-native SIEM on Kafka and Hadoop — reference architecture for DIY
Strengths
- Horizontally scalable on Hadoop/Kafka
- Fully customisable pipeline
Watch-outs
- — No longer actively maintained
- — Extremely high engineering overhead
Best for
Reference only — teams researching open-source SIEM architecture
Prelude SIEM
Open-source SIEM with IDMEF format and sensor integration
Strengths
- IDMEF-compatible — interoperable with various sensors
- Commercial support tier available
- Flexible probe architecture
Watch-outs
- — Less widely adopted than Wazuh or Elastic
- — Smaller community and fewer detection rules
Best for
Teams with specific IDMEF integration requirements
Sigma + custom pipeline (DIY)
Build your own SIEM using Sigma rules + log pipeline + Elasticsearch
Strengths
- Full control over detection logic
- No licensing cost (open tools)
- Vendor-neutral Sigma detection format
Watch-outs
- — Highest engineering effort of any approach
- — No analyst UX — requires custom development
- — Ongoing maintenance burden
Best for
Advanced detection engineering teams wanting full control over the detection stack
Where ManySignal fits
Teams evaluating open-source SIEM are often motivated by cost. ManySignal is worth including in that evaluation: its flat-rate pricing eliminates the per-GB cost escalation that makes commercial SIEMs expensive, and its AI-native detection and investigation delivers significantly more analyst productivity than an open-source SIEM requiring manual tuning and triage. Many teams find the engineering overhead savings make ManySignal cost-competitive with "free" open-source options.
Methodology
Rankings based on community adoption, GitHub activity, documentation quality, and editorial evaluation of security capability. ManySignal is ranked first as publisher. Last updated August 2025.
Open source SIEM FAQs
Is an open-source SIEM right for my team?
Open-source SIEM is a good fit if: you have engineering resources to deploy, configure, and maintain the platform; you have budget constraints that prevent commercial SIEM licensing; you have specific technical requirements that demand full control over the deployment. Open-source SIEM is a poor fit if: you lack dedicated security engineering resources; you want time-to-value under 30 days; or you need AI-assisted triage and investigation.
What is the total cost of ownership for an open-source SIEM?
Open-source SIEM has zero licensing cost but significant engineering TCO: infrastructure costs (servers, storage, network), staff time to deploy and maintain (typically 20–40 hours initial setup plus 5–10 hours per week ongoing), detection engineering to build and tune detection rules, and operational overhead for upgrades and scaling. For small teams, the engineering cost often exceeds commercial SIEM licensing cost.
How does Wazuh compare to commercial SIEMs?
Wazuh is the most complete open-source SIEM option with active development, a broad detection rule library, and a good community. It provides host-based detection via its agent, compliance checking, and basic SIEM correlation. Compared to commercial SIEMs: Wazuh lacks ML-based UEBA, AI investigation, managed threat intelligence, and enterprise support SLAs. It is a viable choice for budget-constrained teams with engineering resources.
Can I use Sigma rules with an open-source SIEM?
Yes. Sigma is a vendor-neutral detection rule format with compilers that output Wazuh rules, Elastic EQL, OpenSearch queries, Splunk SPL, and others. Using Sigma as your primary rule format means your detection content is portable across open-source and commercial platforms. Wazuh and Elastic Security both have community Sigma rule libraries.
What is the difference between Wazuh and the ELK Stack for SIEM?
Wazuh is a purpose-built SIEM that uses Elasticsearch for storage but adds SIEM-specific features: host-based agents, compliance checking, file integrity monitoring, and active response. The ELK Stack is a general-purpose log management platform that can be configured for security use cases with additional setup. Wazuh is easier to get to a working SIEM state out of the box; pure ELK requires more customisation.
How long does it take to set up an open-source SIEM?
A basic Wazuh deployment with agents on a handful of systems: 4–8 hours. A production-grade deployment with log pipelines, tuned detection rules, and dashboards: 2–4 weeks for an experienced engineer. Building the equivalent of an enterprise SIEM capability with open-source tools: 3–6 months of engineering time. Compare to commercial platforms that target 1–2 weeks to initial value.
What detection rules are available for open-source SIEMs?
The Sigma community provides thousands of detection rules for common attack techniques, compilable to Wazuh and Elastic formats. Wazuh has its own built-in rule library covering common attack patterns. Elastic Security includes a pre-built detection rule library. The quality and coverage of community rules varies — expect to tune extensively and add environment-specific rules over time.
Can I scale an open-source SIEM to enterprise log volumes?
Yes, but it requires significant infrastructure engineering. Elastic and OpenSearch both scale horizontally. Wazuh has Wazuh Indexer (Elasticsearch-based) for scale. The engineering effort to scale, tune, and operate a distributed open-source SIEM cluster at enterprise log volumes (100GB+/day) is substantial. At that scale, the infrastructure cost and engineering overhead often approaches or exceeds commercial SaaS SIEM costs.
Does open-source SIEM work for compliance requirements?
Open-source SIEMs can satisfy compliance requirements for log collection, retention, and monitoring — if properly configured. Wazuh includes compliance packs for PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and CIS benchmarks. You will need to document your deployment, demonstrate active monitoring, and ensure log retention meets requirements. Third-party audit firms may require additional evidence compared to commercial platforms with built-in compliance reporting.
What should I do when I outgrow an open-source SIEM?
Signs you've outgrown open-source SIEM: alert volume exceeds analyst capacity and you can't keep up; your team is spending more time maintaining the platform than using it; you need AI investigation or autonomous triage; scaling is hitting infrastructure limits. The migration path typically goes to commercial SaaS SIEM or AI SOC platform. Choose a platform that supports Sigma rule import to preserve your detection content investment.
Compare open-source SIEM to AI-native SOC
Try ManySignal free and see AI investigation vs. manual rule tuning side by side.