Solution — FedRAMP ConMon
A FedRAMP ConMon solution that produces evidence, not screenshots
Monthly monitoring reports, POA&M lifecycle, and AU-6 / SI-4 / CA-7 control evidence generated continuously from real analyst and AI-agent work — packaged for AO review and eMASS submission.
Monthly
ConMon report generated automatically for AO review
10+
FedRAMP controls with primary or supporting coverage
GovCloud
AWS US-East and US-West deployment substrate
FIPS 140-2
Validated cryptography end-to-end
ConMon evidence as a by-product of the work
Traditional ConMon platforms bolt reporting on top of a security stack. ManySignal is the security stack — the reports write themselves because the platform is doing the underlying investigation, triage, and response.
Monthly ConMon report generation
ManySignal produces the operational monitoring evidence a CSP's AO expects — vulnerability posture, POA&M movement, anomaly counts, coverage gaps — formatted for eMASS and XACTA ingestion.
AU-6 automated audit review
Every audit record from FedRAMP-scoped systems is reviewed by an AI triage agent that renders a verdict with attached evidence — eliminating the sampling that fails ConMon audits.
SI-4 continuous system monitoring
Behavioural baselines per identity and asset, computed continuously, satisfy SI-4(2) automated tools and mechanisms without deploying a second SIEM.
CA-7 authorization boundary evidence
Every action inside the authorization boundary lands on an immutable timeline: which system, which control, which analyst or agent, with signed hashes for AO replay.
POA&M lifecycle tracking
Vulnerabilities and detection gaps become POA&M items automatically. Milestones, ownership, and closure evidence are tracked without a separate GRC tool.
US-CERT / CISA incident reporting
Case records format for CIRCIA and US-CERT notification — with the discovery timeline, containment actions, and affected boundary components ready to file.
Legacy ConMon vs ManySignal
| Legacy ConMon stack | ManySignal ConMon |
|---|---|
| Manual monthly ConMon report assembly across 6+ tools | One automated evidence pipeline produces the monthly package |
| AU-6 review by sampling because analysts cannot read every event | Every event triaged to a verdict — the sample is the whole population |
| POA&M lives in a spreadsheet that no one owns | POA&M items generated from actual system state, owned automatically |
| SSP updates lag 3-6 months behind actual system changes | SSP-relevant deltas surfaced monthly with evidence attached |
| AO discovers control drift during annual assessment | Continuous control effectiveness monitoring flags drift the day it happens |
What ends up in the monthly ConMon package
- Vulnerability posture delta (added / closed / risk-accepted)
- POA&M items opened, aged, and closed with evidence
- AU-6 review coverage percentage and verdict distribution
- SI-4 anomaly count with severity breakdown and dispositions
- Incident count with mean detection and mean response times
- Boundary component inventory changes since last submission
- Control effectiveness evidence for continuous controls (CA-7)
- Significant change log with impact classification
FedRAMP ConMon — buyer questions
What is a FedRAMP ConMon solution?
A FedRAMP ConMon (Continuous Monitoring) solution is the tooling and process a Cloud Service Provider uses to satisfy CA-7 and related controls after receiving authorization. It produces the monthly evidence package — vulnerability scans, POA&M updates, incident reports, control effectiveness data — that the Authorizing Official reviews to keep the ATO in effect. ManySignal's ConMon solution automates the monitoring evidence collection for AU-6, SI-4, CA-7, and IR controls.
How does ManySignal compare to standalone ConMon platforms?
Traditional ConMon platforms bolt onto an existing SIEM + SOAR + GRC stack, producing report artefacts from data those tools generate. ManySignal replaces the operational layer directly: telemetry lands in an entity graph, AI agents triage and investigate, evidence generates itself as a by-product of the work. Fewer tools to maintain, and the evidence describes actual analyst work rather than reconstructed screenshots.
Which FedRAMP controls does ManySignal address?
The core coverage is AU-2, AU-6, AU-9, AU-12 (audit logging and review), SI-4 and SI-4(2) (system monitoring, automated tools), CA-7 (continuous monitoring), IR-4 and IR-6 (incident handling and reporting), and RA-5 (vulnerability monitoring). Full control-by-control mapping is available in the SSP package for federal agencies under NDA.
Does ManySignal support Agency ATO?
Yes. Federal agencies can deploy ManySignal in FedRAMP-eligible AWS GovCloud infrastructure under an Agency Authority to Operate while the ManySignal marketplace authorization is finalised. The Agency ATO package is provided to the agency AO for their assessment.
What impact level does ManySignal support?
Moderate is the current target for the marketplace authorization. High is available for agencies operating in customer-controlled GovCloud with the self-hosted deployment configuration — the platform itself is designed to meet High baseline requirements when the deployment substrate does.
How does ConMon reporting frequency work?
FedRAMP requires monthly monitoring evidence submission. ManySignal generates the underlying evidence continuously and packages it monthly for AO review. Off-cycle events — significant changes, incidents, POA&M closures — surface immediately rather than waiting for the monthly cadence.
Get the SSP and ConMon package
Federal agencies and authorized CSPs can request the ManySignal SSP, control implementation summary, and sample monthly ConMon report under NDA.